constraint function
Breaking the $O(\sqrt{T})$ Cumulative Constraint Violation Barrier while Achieving $O(\sqrt{T})$ Static Regret in Constrained Online Convex Optimization
Balasundaram, Haricharan, Mahendran, Karthick Krishna, Vaze, Rahul
The problem of constrained online convex optimization is considered, where at each round, once a learner commits to an action $x_t \in \mathcal{X} \subset \mathbb{R}^d$, a convex loss function $f_t$ and a convex constraint function $g_t$ that drives the constraint $g_t(x)\le 0$ are revealed. The objective is to simultaneously minimize the static regret and cumulative constraint violation (CCV) compared to the benchmark that knows the loss functions and constraint functions $f_t$ and $g_t$ for all $t$ ahead of time, and chooses a static optimal action that is feasible with respect to all $g_t(x)\le 0$. In recent prior work Sinha and Vaze [2024], algorithms with simultaneous regret of $O(\sqrt{T})$ and CCV of $O(\sqrt{T})$ or (CCV of $O(1)$ in specific cases Vaze and Sinha [2025], e.g. when $d=1$) have been proposed. It is widely believed that CCV is $Ω(\sqrt{T})$ for all algorithms that ensure that regret is $O(\sqrt{T})$ with the worst case input for any $d\ge 2$. In this paper, we refute this and show that the algorithm of Vaze and Sinha [2025] simultaneously achieves regret of $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret and CCV of $O(T^{1/3})$ when $d=2$.
- South America > Chile > Santiago Metropolitan Region > Santiago Province > Santiago (0.04)
- North America > United States > Michigan (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Cook County > Chicago (0.04)
- Marketing (1.00)
- Information Technology > Services (0.93)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.14)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Cook County > Chicago (0.04)
- Africa > Rwanda > Kigali > Kigali (0.04)
- Africa > Ethiopia > Addis Ababa > Addis Ababa (0.04)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.93)
- North America > United States > Michigan > Washtenaw County > Ann Arbor (0.04)
- South America > Chile > Santiago Metropolitan Region > Santiago Province > Santiago (0.04)
- North America > United States > New York (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- North America > United States > Texas > Travis County > Austin (0.04)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Asia > India > West Bengal > Kolkata (0.04)
- Asia > India > Maharashtra > Mumbai (0.04)
- Education (0.46)
- Banking & Finance (0.46)
- Information Technology (0.46)
- Government (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Constraint-Based Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Performance Analysis > Accuracy (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (1.00)
- (2 more...)
- North America > United States > Michigan (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Reinforcement Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Optimization (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Undirected Networks > Markov Models (0.35)
- North America > United States > Washington > King County > Seattle (0.04)
- South America > Chile > Santiago Metropolitan Region > Santiago Province > Santiago (0.04)
- Oceania > Australia > New South Wales > Sydney (0.04)
- (7 more...)